White House Protest Corps

A Police State for Black and Brown New Yorkers

A Police State for Black and Brown New Yorkers


By Glen Ford
Created 05/18/2010 – 20:57
click here to listen:

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

New York's finest at workThere is no advice Black and brown parents can give their children to avoid being stopped and frisked by New York City police. Cops last year stopped almost half a million non-whites on the streets based on “furtive movements,” appearing to “case” a person or location, or for reasons explained only as “other.” Apparently, Blacks are nine times as “furtive,” felonious-looking, or “other”-wise threatening, as whites.
A Police State for Black and Brown New Yorkers
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
Stop-and-frisks have reached astronomical heights – increasing five-fold under the current police commissioner – on direct orders of City Hall.”
A full-blown police state exists in New York City. It is not the result of a crime wave; crime has been on the decline for decades, as successive city administrations proudly boast. The New York police state has been methodically constructed by the city administration to create an environment of fear and intimidation in Black and brown neighborhoods. Last year the racist police state juggernaut swept up nearly half a million African American and Latino New Yorkers, while affecting only 53,000 whites.
A Center for Constitutional Rights’ [1] lawsuit forced the city to begin keeping racial data on police activity following the 1999 police killing of Amadou Diallou. The latest data show that Blacks are nine times as likely [2] to be stopped and frisked as whites. And these are anything but polite police procedures; in about one out of four cases, police draw their weapons or throw people to the ground. Still, only about six percent of the stops result in a formal arrest. In other words, in three out of four cases in which cops draw their weapons or use violence against New Yorkers on the street, in involves totally innocent persons, unworthy of arrest. Police used force against only 19 percent of whites, but against 27 percent of Blacks. Those whites that are among the very small proportion stopped by police are slightly more likely to be arrested than Blacks, and one-and-a-half times more likely to be carrying a weapon.
The Center for Constitutional Rights concludes, as would any sane observer, that the stop-and-frisk numbers reflect racial bias, and that they are flagrantly unconstitutional. It is equally clear that stop-and-frisks have reached astronomical heights – increasing five-fold under the current police commissioner – on direct orders of City Hall. The pace of unjustifiable stops has become too fast and furious even for some street cops. The Village Voice newspaper is publishing a series of articles [3] based on secret police recordings of supervisors as they impose relentless and escalating quotas for stops and petty summonses on residents in Black and brown Brooklyn.
In nearly half the cases, cops claim they stopped a pedestrian because he was making ‘furtive movements.’”
This has nothing to do with crime, and everything to do with enforcement of a racist social order.
The cops claim that they are simply exercising their right to stop people based on “reasonable suspicion.” But of course, white racism has its own system of reasoning, its own logic – it even invents or imagines its own facts. Police fill out forms to list the “facts” as they see them, after every stop-and-frisk on the street, as required by New York City law. In nearly half the cases, cops claim they stopped a pedestrian because he was making “furtive movements.” What are “furtive movements”? Apparently, whatever the police think or imagine they are. The second biggest excuse for frisking people – listed in 30 percent of the stops – is that they were “casing a victim or location.” In other words, the cop could just look at the subject and see that he had felonious intentions – that criminal “look” about him. In 19 percent of the cases, the cops don’t even bother to be specific about why they made the person a target of the state; they simply check “other” as the reason.
Why has New York created a police state for Blacks and Latinos? Because the powers-that-be think that a voting majority of citizens approve, and because Black and brown leadership are in the pockets of those in power. For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com [4].
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com [5].

Source URL: http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/police-state-black-and-brown-new-yorkers

[1] http://ccrjustice.org/
[2] http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/13/nyregion/13frisk.html?pagewanted=print
[3] http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/secret-nypd-tapes-document-routine-massive-police-racism
[4] http://www.BlackAgendaReport.com/
[5] mailto:Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com

Shame on Arizona!
Many immigrants that come to the United States from Latin America are victims of SOA graduates

Many immigrants that come to the United States from Latin America are victims of SOA graduates

Arizona’s governor just signed SB 1070 into law, effectively making it legal to racially profile in the state . The bill requires local law enforcement to question anyone they have “reasonable suspicion” of being undocumented. Translation: you could be pulled over for no other reason than that you are brown-skinned or speak Spanish.

That Gov. Jan Brewer could sign such a discriminatory law – one of the worst in the nation – is a moral outrage. We need to send a clear message that Arizona does not deserve economic support from the rest of the country. Tourism is a huge industry in the state – bringing in $18 billion last year. With the passage of SB 1070, it’s time to say shame on Arizona and pledge not spend our dollars in a place where racial profiling is legal. Our friends at Presente.org have set up an online action through which you can send a message to the governor of Arizona, state and local tourism and commerce officials:


SOA Watch supports the struggle for Justice for Immigrants. We understand that many immigrants to the United States are victims of U.S.-sponsored military training and atrocities in Latin America. In our fight to close the SOA, we continue to work towards a world that is free of suffering and violence. We recognize the SOA/ WHINSEC and the unjust immigration policies like SB 1070 as being parts of the same racist system of violence and domination. We ally ourselves with those most affected by SOA violence and their families in our effort to create a better world.

Many immigrants that come to the United States from Latin America are victims of SOA graduates who carry out violence against civilian populations in their own countries. Right now in Colombia, paramilitary groups are terrorizing villages, which causes displacement and migration. But this is hardly a new phenomenon. In the 1980s, during the civil wars in Central America, military and paramilitary groups uprooted people from their homes, and many fled to the United States.

The anti-immigrant politicians who passed SB 1070 may not care about justice and human rights, but they definitely care about the tourism industry that brings in billions of dollars to the state. We need to show them that their decisions have consequences. Will you join us in saying shame on Arizona and pledging to stay away from the state? It only takes a moment:


Thank you and ¡Adelante!
SOA Watch